Sorry for this self-indulgent post. It will probably be of interest to only 0.1% of you.
I have been interviewing high schools students applying to Harvard College for the past three years. There are twice as many applications today as there were in my day, and the admittance rate has correspondingly dropped by half. None of the applicants that I previously interviewed were accepted, and only one, the top student in a class of 600, was wait-listed. All of the applicants though were very talented and qualified as if the weak students self-selected themselves out. In my past MBA life, I have also read applications for the business school with a similarly low acceptance rate and only one of the 15 applications I examined was accepted.
A new student I just interviewed is promising... She has all the right ingredients and knows how to market herself. I googled her on the Internet and found a web trail of achievement starting from middle school. I probably connected with her because of her perfect ACT score, which she claimed only one in the state and 22 in the nation. I checked this statistic on the ACT website and there are actually 500 perfect ACT scores (or 1 in 4,000) in the nation, so the rank was probably just on the instance of the test.
I scored the equivalent of a perfect 1600 in today's SAT, which bests Bill Gates's own 1590. Before the 1995 recentering of the test from an average score of about 900 to 1000, the SAT was scored more stringently with an average of seven 1600s out of over a million in the nation per year (getting a perfect score then made the news); nowadays, it is closer to 700. I also scored a 790 out of 800 in the GMAT, which was the single highest score of my MBA program in my year and subsequent years (except for the most recent year in which an 800 was recorded).
My high school maintained anonymous scores for the past four years, and my score was the highest among a total of 1,600 student's across all those years--an outlier among outlier scores-- despite my school admitting the top third based on a competitive examination. It also was substantially above my Harvard class average.
With a 99+ percentile ranking for both sections of the test, it was clear to me that I made a triple nine (99.9% or 1 in 1000 in my composite score and probably in my individual ones as well). A triple nine is equivalent to a IQ of 149 (std 16); a double nine, 137.
I had taken a college statistics course at Columbia University during my last year of high school, and attempted to see if I made a quadruple nine (99.99% or 1 in 10,000; corresponding to 160 IQ) by computing a percentile from my composite score by assuming a normal distribution and estimating the variance and correlation of math and verbal scores. A normal distribution was a fair assumption because of how questions are "normed" from similarly distributed populations from past tests. I learned that was right on the threshold of a quad, but that the result was extremely sensitive to my estimates.
I decided after the interview to use the web to conduct my research, which was not at my disposal in 1990. Unfortunately, the recentered perfect score tops out at 99.98% or 2 in 10,000 (the original SAT topped out at 99.9995%), so I have to use my original scores.
I decided to look up the qualifying scores for various intelligence societies for the elusive 1 in 10,000 indicator. I was never really impressed with Mensa, because it used scores at the 98th percentile, which are below the average scores of the top public and private schools in the nation, but there are several intelligence societies with more stringent limits.
The intelligence society, Mega Society, which takes one in a million, obtained from an ETS statistician an actual histogram of SAT scores from the five year period between 1984-1988, of which one of the scores is my own, from which I can calculate my actual exact percentile. The process unfortunately is a bit tedious and not worth that much to my ego.
Fortunately, I can let others do the work for me. The Triple Nine Society publishes qualifying scores for various tests. I meet the bar for triple nines for both the SAT and GMAT, each by a wide margin. There is no society which admit members exactly at the quadruple-nine level. The Prometheus Society admits those who meet 1 in 30,000 or roughly 4 sigmas. I am lower than their cutoff but still within the range of statistical insignificance. (Fig 8.3.3)
It doesn't matter that my scores are high, since people still assume I am an idiot. It's also not really satisfying knowing that the tests are inherently flawed and not just for the limited material tested. For instance, I know many non-native English speakers, generally intelligent and gifted in math, feeding the bottom with dismal verbal scores.
You are like totally awesome!
I bet your a hoot at parties..
Posted by: OMG | November 25, 2007 at 03:46 AM
Perhaps these tests exist to filter the egotistical, self-centered, smarties from the smarties who are actually capable of focusing on doing cool stuff (instead of focusing on the number of top-9's they're in based upon some contrived test).
hahaha.
Posted by: Wow | November 25, 2007 at 09:53 AM
Dear OMG commenter, does your brain tell you that in order to be fun at parties you need to be dumb as turd?
Also, Wesner even with all of your intelligence I just keep thinking about the NStatic tool your building and was wondering if you've thought about the market potential and if you'd actually be able to make money from it? Sorry if that seems blunt.
Posted by: reno | November 25, 2007 at 02:39 PM
I experienced a nice physical actualization of triple nines when I won the school math bee in grade school, and then proceeded to win the next level--an interscholastic competition involving winners from 50 different schools. I then drove a few hours to upstate NY state to compete against all the "zone" winners with my family members watching, where I was eliminated in late rounds.
Posted by: Wesner Moise | November 25, 2007 at 02:42 PM
Reno, I thought about the revenue potential and it's clear to me that I could achieve seven figures income for myself.
This is more of a lifestyle business for me with low overhead.
Posted by: Wesner Moise | November 25, 2007 at 02:46 PM
I hope you joined TNS. I think you'd be a credit to any society. You can always take more tests! Prometneus, to give one example (I pick it because I'm a member)accepts WAIS3, Stanford-Binet5, and MAT scores. In any event, your SAT score (1510, I assume, that's the score that corresponds to today's 1600) is way impressive
Posted by: Brian | November 26, 2007 at 08:59 AM
Please post more bowtie pictures, Wes!
Posted by: OMG | November 26, 2007 at 10:26 PM
O/T: I just did a search on google for Wesley Noise to try to find your blog. At this point you may wish to change your name.
Posted by: Daniel Lucraft | November 29, 2007 at 03:18 PM
Let's see what the great blog brain--the pool of internet readers--can do with my scores: http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_dilbert_blog/2007/05/oh_great_blog_b.html
Cutoff scores are from http://www.triplenine.org/main/admission.asp
SAT (1988--unrecentered):
730/800/99+% Verbal
790/800/99+% Math
My total score: 1520/1600
Note: 790s are rarely given (rarer than 800s) in the Math SAT; usually 780 is next score below 800. The test I took must have been harder than usual.
60/60 Test of Standard Written English
Triple-nine cutoff for total: 1450
... for verbal: 730
... for math: ???
==================
GRE (1996?)
730/800/99%ile Verbal
800/800/94%ile Math
800/800/97%ile Analytical Reasoning
My total score: 2330/2400
The GRE has lower percentiles because application pool is more selective. The people who take them are advanced college students, applying to non-professional graduate schools. Math and analytical perfect scores top out at under the 99%percentile.
I was surprised at the consistency between my SAT and GRE scores as if the GRE scores are cross-normed with the SAT. I guess I didn't improve my intelligence during college.
Triple-nine cutoff: 2180
===================
GMAT (1999)
My total score: 790/800/99+% Total
5.0/6.0 Essay
I could probably have perfected the essay, if I had prepared a template in advance. I am not a fast writer and the essay section is not critical to getting into the MBA program, since additional essays have to be sent in anyway.
Triple-nine cutoff: 750
================
I have not taken an official LSAT test. Since I ace virtually every LSAT practice test I take (it has only those sections that I am strongest in), I suspect that if I did take it, it would probably be the first ETS test I pass through with no errors (except perhaps for the recentered SAT).
Posted by: Wesner Moise | December 01, 2007 at 03:50 PM
I hope you realise that your score is only that, a score, for a very narrow definition of intelligence and for a particular type of it.
Are you happy in life, how well do you live with people around you ... Great intelligence often comes at a cost.
Trying to not be so self-centered and constantly bringing everything to yourself would actually increase your self-awareness and make you grow much faster as a person.
Posted by: Worrying reader | December 02, 2007 at 09:12 PM
Hypothetical D&D mage, name: wesnerM
int - 18
wisdom - 3
strength - 9
stamina - 10
dexterity -6
Posted by: sigh | December 03, 2007 at 04:14 PM
I'm impressed, but you still don't know your apostrophes.
Posted by: Linguistics nerd | December 16, 2008 at 04:43 PM